For Beta or Worse
I want to talk this month about my recent experience of having my latest novel road-tested by beta readers. I realise that, for some of us, this would be the equivalent of undergoing surgery without anaesthetic; but I’m happy to report that, not only did the patient (the author) survive, but the long-term prognosis for the novel is cautiously optimistic.
Having readers for our writing is A Good Thing, surely? (*begins
to daydream of effusive adulation, people queuing to polish my halo, a new
Oscar being carved in my image.)
But, potentially, it could be A Very Hard-to-Face Thing.
I mean, what if – saints preserve us – they don’t like it? Find fault? Point at
our Emperor’s New Clothes?
The fact is, whichever way we view it, I’ve found that having
beta readers is An Essential Thing if I’m serious about becoming a better
writer.
So, to talk specifics. I spent about six months last year
crafting my latest magnus opus. By November, I’d tweaked and primped until I
could do no more. My agent loved it (hurrah, since she really hadn’t liked my
previous one!) but said we had to get it read. She duly sent it to a friend of
hers familiar to the industry, and I sent it to members of my writing group and
a friend further afield. When the feedback came in, I simply glanced at it
before collating it into a single document. It wasn’t until the meeting with my
agent that I looked at it properly and, even when I did, I made sure that I
didn’t let my heart get too involved. This was a dispassionate, strategic
planning meeting, not a personal dissection.
In amongst the positive enthusiasm were some scathing
criticisms. The ending didn’t work. The plot was at times unconvincing. The
characters were… Well, you get the point. And, do you know what? I didn’t cry
into my Weetabix. I didn’t throw my writing ambition away.
I was happy.
Yes, really!
Because, suddenly, I was no longer writing solo but as part
of a team. The highlighted comments (pasted all over my study wall!) show me not
only where to improve but how to improve. One person’s suggestion had me
spending a very pleasant, if slightly bizarre, morning researching the
qualities of a psychopath. Others queried something which I could see needed
expanding. Most wanted more – which was hugely encouraging.
I’ve spent February beavering away at the re-write, which
should be finished very soon, and then I’ll send it out AGAIN.
I’ll keep you posted…
Sounds like you’ve absolutely nailed the skill of receiving feedback well, which is crucial and so hard for a lot of us writers! I might borrow your idea of collating it all into one document before reading. All the best for the re-writes!
ReplyDeleteIt is hard, but without receiving feedback we gain neither encouragement nor pointers to the way forward. Thanks for reading and commenting, Claire.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this. It is hard to receive criticism, constructive or otherwise, but it makes us better writers.
ReplyDeleteYes and, actually, it was empowering when I could disagree with some of the comments, too.
DeleteHow brave! Sounds like a great strategy - but don’t let it extinguish your initial vision and impetus x
ReplyDeleteHow brave! Sounds like a great strategy - but don’t let it extinguish your initial vision and impetus x
ReplyDeleteNo, definitely not. If anything, Eileen, it sharpened my original vision...
DeleteThat's such a helpful way to look at it. I think screenwriters probably get to this point of acceptance before novelists might because of the myriad number of people it takes to adapt a script and take it to the final stage. They're used to seeing their work pulled to bits and expect it as part of the process.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we're too precious about our writing? I don't know. I can only repeat how valuable the sense of collaboration has been.
DeleteSuch a wise, encouraging post though I have to admit this is the part I liked most - ' (*begins to daydream of effusive adulation, people queuing to polish my halo, a new Oscar being carved in my image.)' Who hasn't had those moments of imagined glory?! But, as you say, the most helpful ones are the ones that come disguised. The point is, no one will bother to suggest improvements to a book that simply doesn't work. And yours clearly does, it just needs a few tweaks. Looking forward to the finished result, Janey! x
ReplyDeleteThanks, Deborah! It's more than a few tweaks but I'm getting there. You're such a great encourager.
DeleteYes, the process of collaboration that goes with the territory of receiving feedback is strangely satisfying, but sometimes you do wonder.... how much of this is really what is wrong with the script or with the novel and how much is just one person's perspective? Thus that thing of having more than one person is SO important.
ReplyDeleteOh, I definitely wouldn't be overly swayed by one person's opinion. It's when more are saying a similar thing that it becomes really valuable.
DeleteGetting reviews is very difficult for an Indie author. https://usbookreviews.com/ is an affordable service to get high-quality reviews and gain visibility for your book.
ReplyDeleteThanks for that info, Alice
DeleteOh for your resilience! Well done!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Georgie! I tell myself it’s worth the pain...
DeleteI second that!!!
ReplyDelete😊
DeleteI think your attitude is my goal. I'm still more with "What if...they don't like my Emperor's New Clothes?" What if they all have a different opinion?
ReplyDelete