Whoever Gives a Job to a Historian?
Jean Calvin 1509-1564 |
I heard these words in passing, as we History Honours students huddled together in a corridor at university, attired in hired gowns over best dresses/suits and clutching the mortar boards which we would be entitled to wear in a few minutes' time, after graduation. Just one of us had a job offer, the louse from my Reformation in Europe course, who, immediately before finals, had dumped his girlfriend of two years and was now going out with her best friend. He had a management job with a shoe company. Of the rest, a large proportion were about to start PGCE courses. After spending most of my final year studying the Reformation in intense detail and writing a thesis about its impact in the Midlands, I was about to begin a secretarial qualification (a ‘postgraduate’ secretarial qualification, as if this made it any better). This was how I began my circuitous career path towards teaching computing, because - really and truly - no employer needed a historian.
I didn't use my history until I started researching my historical novel, Wodka, or Tea with Milk, which is set during the Solidarnosc years in 1980-81 in Poland. And even then, I was using, not facts, but historical methodology: trust primary sources before secondary sources; find the bias of the author of your source and then interpret it through his/her bias; the dreaded validity (Does this information emanate from a trustworthy source?) and reliability (Is this information repeated elsewhere?)
John Wycliffe 1328-1384 |
Reading these two books has made me think about the role of history in school and university curricula. Education is not just about preparing learners for employment, but about teaching life skills. History is important because, through history, we learn about who we are. This is very important. Well researched historical novels can support this understanding. A badly researched and one-sided historical novel, however, can do a lot of damage.
Lovely post, Rosemary! Thanks. I've truly enjoyed reading this post. There was entertainment, gossip, rumour and lots of food for reflection as to the prospects of historians[other than teaching] in the job market. Blessings.
ReplyDeleteRosemary, I feel your pain on leaving University to do what we all did afterwards: if not going into teaching (I didn't as having specalised in relg\igious Studies, I knew that teaching 'Scripture' to a mixed class of over-30 would simply mean keeping the peace, watching out for note-passing, and generally hearing my very interesting subject derided as only for the dumb among us!) Anyhow, guessing you and I graduated a good while ago I have to say that secretarial courses were almsot expected for all GIRLS back then - men into management, women to type letters for those men until we met and married one! Girls, even graduate girls, had very little chance of other routes into employment except from the vocational subjects such as med students - though at my school those on the maths side were encouraged to study Computing as this was the shape of the future. Things have changed - I so hope today's young women really do have the range of choices we didn't! Great that you used your degree at last, in wriitng historical fiction!
ReplyDeleteI love history too, Rosemary and look forward to reading your book set in Poland.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting post Rosemary. I think that we never lose what we learned when we were younger; we just have to dig deeper. I say, 'Every day is a learning day' and we never stop developing and improving.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your responses. Entertainment and gossip, you say, Sophia? Remind me why we went to university!
ReplyDeleteGlad some other people love history, Sheila . I’ve come to think of history as another art form, like literature and music.
Clare, my pain was your pain. I remember at the time feeling humiliated at being a secretary, although I wasn’t one for long.
Brendan, I got a post on Facebook about Philip Larkin, saying he tried very hard to forget what he learnt at university.