Descriptions and What We Can Learn From (Visual) Artists
by Rosemary Johnson
My colleague, Kathy: “Tea,
Rosemary?”
Me: “Yes please. My mug is on the tea tray, the white one with
flowers on.”
Kathy: “I can’t see a white mug with flowers on it.” Pause.
“I can see one with butterflies
on it.”
Me: “Oh yes. It does
have butterflies on it.”
I have to confess that this conversation was real and took
place, at my work, last week.
My drawing of my cup is better than this. The scanner makes it look awful |
As a writer, descriptions are not my best point - because I
always want to get on with the story. When
I'm reading, I tend to skip over descriptive passages, especially in Victorian
novels where they tend to go in for that sort of thing. Recently, for my church book club, we were
asked to read Madame Bovary by
Gustave Flaubert and Wide Sargasso Sea
by Jean Rhys. Flaubert described the nineteenth
century France countryside in photographic detail, and Rhys’s depictions of
the Caribbean were vivid and deeply emotional.
However, I have to admit that I didn’t finish Madame Bovary, because it bored me rigid, and I’d only award two
stars to Wide Sargasso Sea.
Flaubert and Rhys clearly had developed brilliant
observational skills. Flaubert lived in nineteenth
century France and Rhys in the Caribbean.
In The Oaken Heart (which I’ve
also read recently), Margery Allingham relates how a village coped with wartime;
Allingham’s descriptive powers were also astute and she made her subject-matter
fascinating, probably because she was describing people rather than scenery. All of them were writing-about-what-they-know
– to quote the usual writers’ adage.
My friends who draw and paint tell me that they spend more
time looking than applying pencil/charcoal to paper. Perhaps, I could improve my observational skills
through art. After that incident at
work, I drew my tea mug and a water bottle – which were both in front of me. Then, recalling a funny incident which
occurred the previous weekend, I drew my granddaughter wearing my shoes – one high-heel
and one flat – but I couldn’t remember her expression exactly and this is important. To my mind, it is more effective to describe a
character’s facial expression when they’re experiencing a particular emotion
than to state “She looked angry/ happy/ surprised… etc’. Descriptions of people, in my opinion, engage
the reader in way that descriptions of beautiful scenery don’t.
I’m working on my descriptions. A lot of authors do it better than I am, but –
I'm afraid to say – many others are in the same place as me.
Rosemary
Johnson has had many short stories published, in print and online, most
recently at The Copperfield Review, 101 Words and Café Lit. She has also written a novel about the Cold
War which she is – take deep breath – trying to get published. In real life, she is a part-time IT tutor,
living in Suffolk with her husband and cat.
You’re right, as writers we do need to use our observational skills. We also need to work out how to use these creatively without overwhelming
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately many writers do overwhelm their readers with descriptions of scenery, especially those writing a few centuries ago. I've noticed, though, even modern writers will describe about four things about each character (even minor ones) as he/she appears on the scene.
ReplyDeleteGreat analogy. Thanks Rosemary 🙂
ReplyDelete