To Be or Not To Be, for Historical Fiction Writers - by SC Skillman

How I admire historical fiction writers! It's really only in recent years that I've become a keen reader of historical fiction and for several months now I've felt I might like to write historical fiction myself.

A Kingly figure at Tintagel Castle

Currently, alongside my nonfiction books on Warwickshire, I write mystery novels with a dash of paranormal and supernatural and a dose of the gothic. England's history often comes into it - especially in my latest one, Director's Cut, which I'm currently trying to place with a publisher. It's set in a seventeenth century house whose inhabitants believe themselves locked into an intergenerational curse. I have read real life cases of this kind of thing, among families living in period properties, and it has a lot to do with the history of the house. In the case of my own story I make several references to the period of the English Civil War. My story has a contemporary setting, with many historical references.

But, when considering the possibility of writing historical fiction, the question always arises: which period should I choose? Obviously, I don't want to settle on a period already over-represented in fiction, however fascinating I find it. The Tudors seem to be in top position at the moment, and have been for quite a while. That may be partly because decisions made in those times still have a significant impact on our lives today.

So what period to choose? And what about research? Well, you may say, why not choose a period that hardly anybody knows anything conclusive about, to challenge you with? What about.... the so-called Dark Ages?

Visitors climbing down the rocky headland at Tintagel Castle

Recently I re-visited the headland at Tintagel, a glorious, dramatic location. Its association with the myth of King Arthur, and the many archaeological discoveries there, fascinate me. I bought a book in the English Heritage gift shop, which I'm now reading: Exploring the World of King Arthur by Christopher Snyder.



Exploring the World of King Arthur by Christopher Snyder - book cover image

The contents include:

the historical background of Arthur's Britain, including the contributions of the Celts and the Romans;

The culture of Arthur's Britons and their battle for supremacy against the Picts, the Scots and the Saxons

The chronicles and legends of the Britons, from the writings of St Patrick to the prophecies of Merlin

Many other elements are included. Currently I'm immersed in the fifth and the sixth centuries, those supposedly 'dark' centuries when we have no written record other than those by St Patrick and Gildas. They were the times after the Romans officially announced the Britons could now defend themselves, and left these shores to fight their own battles elsewhere.

From then on, hoards of invaders from every country in Europe, it seems, swept in, (with of course no opportunity to consult with each other beforehand over their plans!!) to try their luck at taking over Britain. What amuses me is that one of the local chieftains agreed to hire Saxon mercenaries to help them, and when those mercenaries arrived it wasn't long before they decided to just try and take over themselves.

As one of my favourite books, 1066 and All That, expresses it:

The withdrawal of the Roman legions to take part in Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (due to a clamour among the Romans for pompous amusements such as bread and circumstances) left Britain defenceless and subjected Europe to that long succession of Waves of which History is chiefly composed. While the Roman Empire as overrun by waves not only of Ostrogoths, Vizigoths, and even Goths, but also of Vandals (who destroyed works of art) and Huns (who destroyed everything and everybody, including Goths, Ostrogoths, Vizigoths, and even Vandals), Britain was attacked by waves of Picts (and, of course, Scots) who had recently learned how to climb the wall, and of Angles, Saxons, and Jutes who, landing at Thanet, soon overran the country with fire (and, of course, the sword).

The writers of 1066 And All That, W.C. Sellars and R.J. Yeatman, have never been bettered, in my view, and they anticipated Horrible Histories by seventy years.

Of course, the humour in 1066 And All That can only be fully appreciated by those who know their history well. But I must confess that I now feel tempted to write a novel from the point of view of a Vizigoth or a Pict (know nothing whatsoever about them, as individuals)!  However, at the moment, I'm reading through my book on the World of King Arthur, and find it utterly absorbing. During my reading and note-taking or perhaps by the end I hope to have a much more focused idea on what kind of story I might write, whether it be nonfiction, historical fiction, time-travel or simply an element in another contemporary novel.

I welcome any thoughts and ideas from seasoned historical fiction writers who read this post!

SC Skillman, author

Sheila lives in Warwickshire, and writes mystery fiction and non-fiction under the pen name SC Skillman. She is a member of the Society of Authors and the Association of Christian Writers. Her nonfiction books on Warwickshire local history are published by Amberley and includes Paranormal Warwickshire and Illustrated Tales of Warwickshire; her next book A-Z of Warwick, will be released in November 2023. Her new novel Director's Cut is with publishers and she is working on the sequel.
She was born and brought up in Orpington Kent, and has loved reading and writing most of her life. She studied English Literature at Lancaster University and her first permanent job was with BBC Schools Radio. Later she lived for nearly five years in Australia before returning to the UK. She has now settled in Warwick with her husband and son and her daughter currently lives and works in Australia.





Comments

  1. I had to look up the definition of historical fiction (naively thinking there might just be one ....) when writing Cuckoo in the Nest. It's all about perspective, isn't it? - I'm sure that any teenager reading a book set in 1976 might think of it as ancient let alone historical fiction. There's an interesting discussion of it on this article I found https://www.historiamag.com/what-counts-historical-fiction/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Fran, I'll check that out.

      Delete
    2. I've had a look at the website 'what counts as historical fiction'; and I tend to think the only way to approach it is to write a story about someone from within their heart and mind and relationships, set in a period I find interesting. Then when that first draft is written, do the detailed research, and consider how that person's life and experience will be constrained or enhanced by the culture and presumptions and values of the time, by the major political events, by the details of what hadn't been invented yet, and what they did and used instead.... etc etc. I know one historical novelist who said she writes the story first and researches as she goes along.

      Delete
  2. I don't read much historical fiction but there are certain writers in this genre who I really enjoy: Rosemary Sutcliff, Kevin Crossley Holland, Elizabeth Chadwick, Sarah Waters (who specialises in the Victorian and post WW2 eras). I love Rosemary Sutcliff's Roman Trilogy, and also 'Dawn Wind', set on the cusp of the Anglo-Saxon takeover of Sub-Roman Britain. Plus her Arthurian novel 'Sword at Sunset', which takes a historical view of Artos, the great Romano-British warrior-king who may or may not have existed, but also explains the origins of the legends about him.

    Have you read Thomas Cahill's 'How the Irish Saved Civilization'? A great take on the so-called 'Dark' Ages.

    I greatly admire historical fiction writers because of all the research involved!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Philippa. It sounds as if you are a great lover of historical fiction! I must read the last three books you mention: they sound essential reading for me! Even from what I've read so far in my current book, I have an inkling of what Thomas Cahill may be saying about the Irish and how they saved civilisation.

      Delete
  3. Lovely post, Sheila, thanks! I only read historical fiction if I have to review. I admire writers of this genre for the vigorous research they put in their work. So, go ahead and write one! Your trips to Tintagel might inspire you. All the best. Blessings!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love historical fiction and my particular favourites are The Marco Didius Falco and Flavia Alba series by Lindsey Davis. She brings the Roman era to life and does so in a way which is accessible. I think this is the challenge of the historical novelist, to write a book which gives a flavour of the time yet is accessible to the modern reader. That is what I am trying to do with my historical fiction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A wonderful example Wendy! I agree that Lindsey Davis's Roman novels open up the world of Marco and Flavia in the most brilliant way. I've heard her speak twice now, at local literary festivals. She is certainly an inspiration. (Sheila)

      Delete
  5. If you love historical fiction do check out C.F.Dunn's Wheel of Fortune, recently published by Resolute Books, first in a series called The Tarnished Crown. Volume 2 is due out in the autumn. It's a terrific story set in the era of the Wars of the Roses, written with Claire's trademark fluency and underpinned by meticulous research.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Had I read historical fiction in my teens I might just have kept
    more awake in history lessons! Currently reading Robert Harris’ excellent book Act of Oblivion based very closely on actual events as Charles’ II hit squad chase down two escaping ‘regicides’ who escaped to New England. That might have fired up more of an interest than a dull text book and copying notes from the board! Do keep writing historical fiction, you don’t who you might be educating as well as entertaining!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think there is a lot of fiction around about King Arthur! Though you could go with that time period and steer clear of the well-known characters, perhaps. The great thing about choosing something slightly mythological (I speak from experience) is that you have so much more scope to 'play' with it. If you choose a historical time period we know loads about, you have to be quite careful, but if historians don't know much, then you can make most of it up with no fear of retribution. :-) Time travel novels or dual timeline novels sound like they'd suit you very well. Go for it!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment