Writing historical fiction – the role of eyewitnesses.

Realising that my next 7th of the month MTW post would coincide with the horrifying events of October 7th 2023, I have felt compelled to pay my respects, and to examine the role of eyewitnesses in writing historical fiction.

On October 7th, 2023, the world awoke to the news that Hamas had launched a pre-planned and coordinated attack on several Israeli kibbutzim and the Supernova music festival, murdering over a thousand Israelis and foreign nationals, mostly unarmed citizens, including children, and taking hostage 250 individuals of whom 40 have died while held in captivity and 100 are yet to be returned.

The gruesome eye-witness accounts all report the indiscriminate nature of the attack even if some of the minor details and interpretations seem to be at odds with each other.

Since then the violence has increased multiplying the suffering of Jews and Arabs and all those caught up in the Israel-Gaza war. Our prayers continue.

Those of us attempting to write historical fiction occupy what might be called an interstitial space between accurately documented events or biographies and our creative imagination. Fact and fiction are woven together, and it’s left to the reader to pick at the strands, if they wish to, to differentiate between the two. It’s more immediate with films that take maybe 2-3 hours to enjoy, whereas a typical Hilary Mantel will occupy the reader for days, weeks, or, in my case, months! 

A plug whilst I'm here: the recently published The West in Her Eyes, Janet Hancock (Resolute Books), is an excellent read and a great example of how to put fiction into history - and vice versa.

The distinction between The Crown, Ghandi, Cry Freedom, Apollo 13, and Braveheart or Ben Hur, is that the first four in the list were made when eye-witnesses were still alive. In contrast, Braveheart and Ben Hur were based (however loosely) on historical accounts long after the eyewitnesses had died. 

Where does our moral compass point when it comes to preserving historical accuracy within historical fiction? 

After all, we are storytellers, not journalists, or historians. Is there a tacit and playful agreement between the reader and the writer that permits, even expects, the writer to go off-piste? (I hope so!) But how far off-piste? Or maybe that is sailing very close to Mark Twain’s maxim of ‘never letting the truth get in the way of a good story’? 

Palestinian writer, Susan Abulhawa, in her beautifully written Mornings in Jenin, and Jewish writer, Assaf Gavron’s wonderful The Hilltop, illustrate the tension between using historical fiction as a tool for propaganda and a genuine, if biased, outpouring of hopes and dreams for a better world.



Comments

  1. A helpful post. What I like in historical fiction is an Author's note at the back of the book, which provides the historical facts and makes it clear what creative liberties the author has taken. I don't mind creative liberties being taken, that's inevitable in fiction, but I think it's important to know the facts. I think that is incredibly important with recent history, especially regarding subjects like the Holocaust.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A very interesting post, thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Historical truth v creative interpretation? A thorny problem which never lies down. Me, with a history degree, I always tend towards historical accuracy. In my novel (Wodka, or Tea with Milk) about the Solidarnosc trade union, I stuck very closely to events as they actually happened. I was lucky because, with these happenings being so recent, I had lots of resources telling what happened exactly when. I was also conscious that my book might be read by someone who was actually there, they would be very indignant about any divergences.
    I didn't actually feel the need to bend the truth, probably because I was writing about fictitious characters and not historical personages, although at a couple of points I quoted Lech Walesa word for word... making sure it was really word for word.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting period of history. Some individuals seem to transcend the hour. Your response seems to be very consistent with others…I’m glad to see! And helpful in my endeavours. Thank you for your comment.

      Delete
  4. Lovely post, John.Thanks. Interesting and very informative. Blessings.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's a tricky subject and particularly so when it is around a conflict still raging. Beautifully written as always, John.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment